Seismic bearing capacity of strip footings adjacent to slopes using pseudo dynamic approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Qom University of Technology

Abstract

Determining of the seismic bearing capacity has a great importance for foundations located near sloping ground in geotechnical earthquake engineering. In this paper a new formulation based on the pseudo-dynamic method is presented to calculate the seismic bearing capacity of strip foundations resting on C-φ soil which are adjacent to slope using limit equilibrium method. The seismic bearing capacity coefficient Nγe for the simultaneous resistance of surcharge, unit weight and cohesion is calculated considering two-sided composite rupture surface which is the combination of a logarithmic spiral and planar surfaces. This failure mechanism comprises of two slip surfaces which are assumed that a realistic failure surface occurs on the side of slope and the resistance mobilization is taken into account on the side without slope. Using the presented approach a parametric study is conducted to study the effect of various parameters such as soil cohesion, soil friction angle, slope angle, horizontal, and vertical seismic coefficients. Results show the bearing capacity coefficient increases by approximately 176 and 264% when β increases from 10 to 20° and from 20 to 30°, respectively. The results of this study are compared with the few pseudo-static results available in the literature. Present procedure give lower amount of bearing capacity of strip footings in comparison with the results of pseudo-static analysis.

Keywords


[1] F. Askari, O. Farzaneh, Upper-bound solution for seismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations near slopes, Geotechnique, 53(8) 2003, 697–702.
[2] M. Budhu, A. Al-Karni, Seismic Bearing Capacity of Soils, Geotechnique, 43 (1) 1993, 181–187.
[3] D. Choudhury, D., S. Nimbalkar, Seismic Passive Resistance by Pseudo-dynamic Method.” Geotechnique, 55 (9) 2005, 699–702.
[4] D. Choudhury, K. S. Subba Rao, Seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip footings embedded in slope, Int. J. Geomech., 6(3) 2006, 176–184.
[5] L. Dormieux, A. Pecker, Seismic bearing capacity of foundations on cohesionless soil, J Geotech Eng, ASCE, 121(3) 1995, 300–303.
[6] P. Ghosh, Upper bound solutions of bearing capacity of strip footing by pseudo-dynamic approach, Acta Geotechnica, 3 2008, 115– 123.
[7] P. Ghosh, J. Kumar, Seismic bearing capacity of strip footings adjacent to slopes using the upper bound limit analysis, Electronic J. Geotech. Eng., 10 2005, 1–13.
[8] W. Hijab, A Note on the Centroid of a Logarithmic Spiral Sector, Geotechnique, 4(2) 1956, 96-99.
[9] J. Kumar, P. Ghosh, Seismic bearing capacity for embedded footings on sloping ground, Geotechnique, 56(2) 2006, 133–140.
[10] J. Kumar, N. Kumar, Seismic bearing capacity of rough footings on slopes using limit equilibrium, Geotechnique, 53(3), 2003, 363–369.
[11] A. Saha, A., S. Ghosh, Pseudo-dynamic Analysis for Bearing Capacity of Foundation Resting on c–Φ Soil, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 9 (4) 2014, 379–387.
[12] S. Saran, V.K. Sud, S.C. Handa, Bearing capacity of footings adjacent to slopes, J. Geotech. Eng., 115(4) 1989, 553–573.
[13] S.K. Sarma, Y. C. Chen, Seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip footings near sloping round, Proc. of 5th SECED (Society for Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics) Conf. European Seismic Design Practice, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1995, 505–512.
[14] S.K. Sarma, I. S. Iossifelis, Seismic bearing capacity factors of shallow strip footings, Geotechnique, 40(2) 1990, 265–273.
[15] A.H. Soubra, Seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip footings in seismic conditions, Proc Instn Civil Engrs Geotech Engr, 125(4) 1977, 230–241.
[16] A.H. Soubra, Upper bound solutions for bearing capacity of foundations, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE, 125(1) 1999, 59–69.
[17] R.S. Steedman, X. Zeng, The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall, Geotechnique, 40(1) 1990, 103–112, .