Parametric distance measure for trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application in Multi-criteria group decision-making

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Management, Humanities College, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran

2 Department of Mathematic, Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Qom, Qom, Iran. g.h.shirdel@qom.ac.ir

3 Department of Electrical Engineering, Shohadaye Hoveizeh Campus of Technology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Dasht-e Azadegan, Khuzestan, Iran. m.farnam@scu.ac.ir

4 Department of Mathematics, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Khouzestan, Iran. darehmiraki@bkatu.ac.ir

Abstract
It is important to have an intuitionistic fuzzy set that allows each set element to have a membership value, a non-membership value, and a hesitancy value. This is because each element of the set can possess all three values. We will focus on one type of continuous intuitionistic fuzzy number, called trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, because they are more flexible in representing information about membership and non-membership functions and are continuous. This research aims to introduce a parametric ranking and distance measure to compare and obtain the distinction value between intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Parametric measures offer more flexibility than deterministic measurement tools in modeling real-world problems by considering a suitable variety of responses based on different levels of parameters. After presenting the structure and effective indicators of the proposed tool, we have detailed its features and basic principles. Moreover, based on this measure, a hybrid process is designed for multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems with trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy data. A numerical example is also examined to elucidate the implementation process of this integrated methodology. Additionally, comparative analysis with some related methods confirms the adequate performance of the new parametric measure in combined methods with similar subjects.

Keywords

Subjects


[1] Altan Koyuncu, C., Aydemir, E., & Başarır, A. C. J. S. C. (2021). Selection Industry 4.0 maturity model using fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS methods for a solar cell manufacturing company. 25(15), 10335-10349.
[2] Atanassov, K. T. (1999). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Springer.
[3] Atanassov, K. T., & Stoeva, S. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets Systems, 20(1), 87-96.
[4] Boran, F., Boran, K., & Menlik, T. (2012). The evaluation of renewable energy technologies for
electricity generation in Turkey using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, Policy, 7(1), 81-90.
[5] Boran, F. E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363-11368.
[6] Chen, S.-J., & Hwang, C.-L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. In Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications (pp. 289-486): Springer.
[7] Cheng, Q., Kang, Y., Yang, C., Zhang, C., & Chen, C. (2023). A new reliability allocation method for machine tools based on ITrFNs and AHP-GRA. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 124(11-12), 4019-4032.
[8] Cheng, Q., Wang, C., Sun, D., Chu, H., & Chang, W. (2021). A new reliability allocation method for machine tools using the intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and TOPSIS. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1-12.
[9] Chutia, R., & Saikia, S. (2018). Ranking intuitionistic fuzzy numbers at levels of decision‐making and its application. Expert systems, 35(5), e12292.
[10] Ebrahimian, A., Ardeshir, A., Rad, I. Z., & Ghodsypour, S. H. (2015). Urban stormwater construction method selection using a hybrid multi-criteria approach. Automation in Construction, 58, 118-128.
[11] Fatehi Kivi, A., Mehdizadeh, E., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Najafi, S. E. (2021). Solving a MultiItem Supply Chain Network Problem by Three Meta-heuristic Algorithms. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 14(2), 129-135.
[12] Gaspars-Wieloch, H., & Decisions. (2023). Scenario planning as a new application area for TOPSIS. Operations Research, 33.
[13] Jianqiang, W., & Zhong, Z. (2009). Aggregation operators on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its application to multi-criteria decision making problems. Journal of Systems Engineering, 20(2), 321-326.
[14] Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Salehi Sadaghiani, J., & Hassani Goodarzi, G. (2014). Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type 2 fuzzy sets. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75, 1115-1130.
[15] Khalifehzadeh, S., Seifbarghy, M., & Naderi, B. (2017). Solving a fuzzy multi objective model of a production–distribution system using meta-heuristic based approaches. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 95-109.
[16] Li, D.-F. (2014). Decision and game theory in management with intuitionistic fuzzy sets (Vol. 308): Springer.
[17] Li, D.-F., & Cheng, C. (2002). New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern recognition letters, 23(1-3), 221-225.
[18] Li, D. F., Nan, J. X., & Zhang, M. J. (2010). A ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to decision making. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(5), 522-530.
[19] Li, X., & Chen, X. (2014). Extension of the TOPSIS method based on prospect theory and trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for group decision making. Journal of Systems Science Systems Engineering, 23(2), 231-247.
[20] Li, X., & Chen, X. (2015). Multi-criteria group decision making based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 454-461.
[21] Liu, J., Qiang, Z., Wu, P., & Du, P. (2023). Multiple stage optimization driven group decision making method with interval linguistic fuzzy preference relations based on ordinal consistency and DEA cross-efficiency. Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making, 22(2), 309-336.
[22] Makui, A., Gholamian, M. R., & Mohammadi, E. (2016). A hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making approach for supplier selection. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 9(20), 61-73.
[23] Memari, A., Dargi, A., Jokar, M. R. A., Ahmad, R., & Rahim, A. R. A. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of manufacturing systems, 50, 9-24.
[24] Park, J. H., Cho, H. J., & Kwun, Y. C. (2011). Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making, 10, 233-253.
[25] Razmi, J., Songhori, M. J., & Khakbaz, M. H. (2009). An integrated fuzzy group decision making/fuzzy linear programming (FGDMLP) framework for supplier evaluation and order allocation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43, 590-607.
[26] Rouyendegh, B. D., Yildizbasi, A., & Ustunyer, P. (2020). Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem. Soft Computing, 24, 2215-2228.
[27] Sayyadi Tooranloo, H., Karimi Takalo, S., & Mohyadini, F. (2022). Analysis of Causal Relationships Effective Factors on the Green Supplier Selection in Health Centers Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cognitive Map (IFCM) Method. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 15(1), 93-108.
[28] Wan, S.-p. (2013). Power average operators of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(6), 4112-4126.
[29] Wan, S.-P., Dong, J.-Y., & decision. (2010). Method of intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number for multi-attribute group decision. Control, 25(5), 773-776. Wang, X., & Triantaphyllou, E. (2008). Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega, 36(1), 45-63.
[30] Wang, Y.-J. (2020). Utilization of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and extended fuzzy preference relation for multi-criteria group decision-making based on individual differentiation of decisionmakers. Soft Computing, 24(1), 397-407.
[31] Altan Koyuncu, C., Aydemir, E., & Başarır, A. C. J. S. C. (2021). Selection Industry 4.0 maturity model using fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS methods for a solar cell manufacturing company. 25(15), 10335-10349.
[32] Atanassov, K. T. (1999). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Springer.
[33] Atanassov, K. T., & Stoeva, S. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets Systems, 20(1), 87-96.
[34] Boran, F., Boran, K., & Menlik, T. (2012). The evaluation of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation in Turkey using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, Policy, 7(1), 81-90.
[35] Boran, F. E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363-11368.
[36] Chen, S.-J., & Hwang, C.-L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. In Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications (pp. 289-486): Springer.
[37] Cheng, Q., Kang, Y., Yang, C., Zhang, C., & Chen, C. (2023). A new reliability allocation method for machine tools based on ITrFNs and AHP-GRA. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 124(11-12), 4019-4032.
[38] Cheng, Q., Wang, C., Sun, D., Chu, H., & Chang, W. (2021). A new reliability allocation method for machine tools using the intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and TOPSIS. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1-12.
[39] Chutia, R., & Saikia, S. (2018). Ranking intuitionistic fuzzy numbers at levels of decision‐making and its application. Expert systems, 35(5), e12292.
[40] Ebrahimian, A., Ardeshir, A., Rad, I. Z., & Ghodsypour, S. H. (2015). Urban stormwater construction method selection using a hybrid multi-criteria approach. Automation in Construction, 58, 118-128.
[41] Fatehi Kivi, A., Mehdizadeh, E., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Najafi, S. E. (2021). Solving a MultiItem Supply Chain Network Problem by Three Meta-heuristic Algorithms. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 14(2), 129-135.
[42] Gaspars-Wieloch, H., & Decisions. (2023). Scenario planning as a new application area for TOPSIS. Operations Research, 33.
[43] Jianqiang, W., & Zhong, Z. (2009). Aggregation operators on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its application to multi-criteria decision making problems. Journal of Systems Engineering, 20(2), 321-326.
[44] Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Salehi Sadaghiani, J., & Hassani Goodarzi, G. (2014). Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75, 1115-1130.
[45] Khalifehzadeh, S., Seifbarghy, M., & Naderi, B. (2017). Solving a fuzzy multi objective model of a production–distribution system using meta-heuristic based approaches. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 95-109.
[46] Li, D.-F. (2014). Decision and game theory in management with intuitionistic fuzzy sets (Vol. 308): Springer.
[47] Li, D.-F., & Cheng, C. (2002). New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern recognition letters, 23(1-3), 221-225.
[48] Li, D. F., Nan, J. X., & Zhang, M. J. (2010). A ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to decision making. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(5), 522-530.
[49] Li, X., & Chen, X. (2014). Extension of the TOPSIS method based on prospect theory and trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for group decision making. Journal of Systems Science Systems Engineering, 23(2), 231-247.
[50] Li, X., & Chen, X. (2015). Multi-criteria group decision making based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 454-461.
[51] Liu, J., Qiang, Z., Wu, P., & Du, P. (2023). Multiple stage optimization driven group decision making method with interval linguistic fuzzy preference relations based on ordinal consistency and DEA cross-efficiency. Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making, 22(2), 309-336.
[52] Makui, A., Gholamian, M. R., & Mohammadi, E. (2016). A hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making approach for supplier selection. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 9(20), 61-73.
[53] Memari, A., Dargi, A., Jokar, M. R. A., Ahmad, R., & Rahim, A. R. A. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of manufacturing systems, 50, 9-24.
[54] Park, J. H., Cho, H. J., & Kwun, Y. C. (2011). Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making, 10, 233-253.
[55] Razmi, J., Songhori, M. J., & Khakbaz, M. H. (2009). An integrated fuzzy group decision making/fuzzy linear programming (FGDMLP) framework for supplier evaluation and order allocation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43, 590-607.
[56] Rouyendegh, B. D., Yildizbasi, A., & Üstünyer, P. (2020). Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem. Soft Computing, 24, 2215-2228.
[57] Sayyadi Tooranloo, H., Karimi Takalo, S., & Mohyadini, F. (2022). Analysis of Causal Relationships Effective Factors on the Green Supplier Selection in Health Centers Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cognitive Map (IFCM) Method. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 15(1), 93-108.
[58] Wan, S.-p. (2013). Power average operators of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(6), 4112-4126.
[59] Wan, S.-P., Dong, J.-Y., & decision. (2010). Method of intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number for multi-attribute group decision. Control, 25(5), 773-776.
[60] Wang, X., & Triantaphyllou, E. (2008). Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega, 36(1), 45-63.
[61] Wang, Y.-J. (2020). Utilization of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and extended fuzzy preference relation for multi-criteria group decision-making based on individual differentiation of decisionmakers. Soft Computing, 24(1), 397-407.
[62] Wei, G. (2010). Some arithmetic aggregation operators with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. J. Comput., 5(3), 345-351.
[63] Wu, J., & Cao, Q.-w. (2013). Same families of geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(1-2), 318-327.
[64] Wu, X., Zhu, Z., Chen, C., Chen, G., & Liu, P. (2022). A monotonous intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method under general linear orders via admissible distance measures. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.
[65] Xu, Z. (2007). Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making, 6, 109-121.
[66] Xu, Z., & Chen, J. (2008). An overview of distance and similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Systems, 16(04), 529-555.
[67] Ye, J. (2011). Expected value method for intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multicriteria decision-making problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11730-11734.
[68] Ye, J. (2012a). Multicriteria group decision-making method using the distances-based similarity measures between intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. International Journal of General Systems, 41(7), 729-739.
[69] Ye, J. (2012b). Multicriteria group decision-making method using vector similarity measures for trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Group Decision, 21(4), 519-530.
[70] Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information control, 8(3), 338-353.
[71] Zhang, L., Zhan, J., & Yao, Y. (2020). Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on CVPIFRS models: an application to biomedical problems. Information Sciences, 517, 315-339
Volume 5, Issue 4
Autumn 2024
Pages 61-84

  • Receive Date 22 October 2024
  • Revise Date 05 December 2024
  • Accept Date 07 December 2024